I will agree that the Adorama site (in its current form August - 2012) is not as intuitive or user-friendly as the B&H site. Adorama has gone through a couple of site refreshes in the last few years, and each has brought improvements (and small, isolated steps backwards, in my opinion). Generally, though, it gets better with time.

The change from B&H to Adorama resulted from B&H no longer recognizing the advertising revenue generated from the site because of a state sales tax law reinterpretation in Bryan's home state (at least, that's the simple version). It was a mess. *Bryan went through great lengths to rectify the situation, but he was unable to smooth things out with B&H; the switch to Adorama was long over-due, at least from a fiscal standpoint.

Bryan works hard to bring us the most comprehensive and reliable review information for Canon products that's out there. *If you find his hard work useful when making a purchasing decision, then I'm sure he would appreciate you using Adorama to support the site even if it comes at a slight inconvenience in user-friendliess.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/N...aspx?News=2705

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2