-
Senior Member
Re: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS vs. EF 70-200mm f/4L IS
Mark;
Your lens setup has the 10mm - 400mm pretty well wrapped up. What will you be using 70-200 for that the 24-105 and 100-400 won't cover?
The 70-200 is a pretty expensive for redundancy, unless you're shooting (a lot of) indoor events, then the 2.8 is your answer.
But if this isn't the case, go for a big prime.
Regards
Bill
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules