Bob, I have to agree with Marks logic. Trading two sweet lenses for another sweet lens I would miss the ones I traded. I like the idea of having all three.
After I posted about the second lens I wanted to make sure I gave the lens every chance. I took some test chart pics with it so I could compare the next copy. I requested the RMA on Sunday, B&H got confused though because it appeared to be the same order they already switched out. I called this morning and shipped the lens back UPS today. I paid the overnight fee because I wanted it back quick. B&H is up to about +4 in my book now.
But, I wouldn't let my experience hold you back. Either of the copies I have had would be a huge step up from any Canon Zoom I have had in that range. The first copy delivered better sharpness than my primes, and the second was less sharp but still sharp by zoom standards.
If you order you one do it when you have time to check it out. I think you will be well pleased.
Are you still shooting with the 7D? If so both copies I have had I doubt you would have noticed that one wasn't as sharp as the other. It was in the corners that I could see this and you wouldn't see this on the crop. The center was as good as either of my primes on both copies. My suggestion is that you could really benefit with a FF with this lens.
One other note, while the resolution is a close match to the primes, other things like distortion make the primes the better choice for the specific focal length.





Reply With Quote
