I would also say that a better setup of the clothes with better lighting would make more of a difference than a camera. Especially if you are just going to downsize them to put them online.
I think most current DSLRs will be fine, and you could probably get a prime lens (no zoom) if you are photographing items that are all about the same size, which would typically yield a better image and cost less money then a high end zoom.
If you do plan to stick with shooting the clothes placed on the floor, I would avoid the 17-55. I don't know if other people experience this, but my 17-55 would fall all the way to 55mm if I had it on a tripod aimed at the floor for very long. Basically the glass in the lens is so heavy that its weight extends the lens to 55mm if it's pointed downward for an extended time.
R6 II --- RF 14-35mm f/4L IS --- RF 24-105mm f/4L IS --- RF 70-200mm F4L IS --- RF 100-400mm F5.6-8 IS --- RF 24mm f/1.4L --- RF 600mm f/11
70D --- EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 --- EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS --- EF 70-200mm f/4L IS --- EF 85mm f/1.8
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote