Just for the sake of asking, is this desire something that could be cured (or merely explored) with an EF-S 10-22mm lens?
Just for the sake of asking, is this desire something that could be cured (or merely explored) with an EF-S 10-22mm lens?
We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.
peety,
I like that idea, too. A 100mm f/2.8 macro and EF-S 10-22 together are less than $1500. The macro, at least, is able to migrate to full frame later, in case that ends up happening. That way, the 10-22 on his 30D could be as wide as a 16-35 on a FF. Different approach, but good idea.
Yep, I figure if the 30D and 10-22 isn't a permanent solution, it could make an appealing package to sell sometime down the road. Plus, he'd know right away if a 16-35 was an extra, essential, or necessity when buying a full-frame body. The only (rectilinear) thing wider would be the 14/2.8L on a full-frame.
We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote