-
Re: How Close to Look? or New Lens Paranoia?
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"]I remember the dread I felt when I first noticed a speck *inside* my 24-70. Roll on feelings of guilt, must be terrible photographer, can’t even keep expensive equipment in decent condition, going to store my glass in hermetically sealed vacuums, etc., etc., (don’t know what a ‘goober’ is, but it sounds like how I felt at the time). So I rushed to a Canon service centre here in Athens and was told that the speck would have to be huge to show up in pictures (unlike dust on the sensor). My angst-ridden desire to part with hard-earned money (“can you take my lens apart and clean it, please?&rdquo
was met with benevolent (and honest) scorn. The answer was no. I noticed this on the 85 mm portrait lens, too. Arghh! If you’re really worried about it, follow the dust delete data instructions in your camera to correct for it, but if you really can’t see any defects, come and join the ranks of wiser, sadder photographers and their blemishes…
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"]On a more serious note, Bryan always points out that weather-sealed L lenses are only sealed when a filter is used and the 100 mm isn’t an L. There must be imperfections in the glass manufacturing process which QC at Canon lets through because the overall IQ doesn’t suffer, but if you truly want to learn the meaning of lens speck pain, Google ‘Canon dust pump’…
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules