Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM or 300 f/2.8 L IS USM?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM or 300 f/2.8 L IS USM?



    Quote Originally Posted by Rodger


    Any tips on getting through unnoticed?
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Have bigger boobs than gear... (sorry, but that seems to work for my wife).

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM or 300 f/2.8 L IS USM?



    Quote Originally Posted by WAFKT


    Quote Originally Posted by Rodger


    Any tips on getting through unnoticed?
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Have bigger boobs than gear... (sorry, but that seems to work for my wife).


    Uh, wait. And she's getting a 400mm f/2.8?



  3. #3

    Re: 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM or 300 f/2.8 L IS USM?



    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle


    Uh, wait. And she's getting a 400mm f/2.8?
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>





    Ha! I see your point... I hope I don't have to but a new pair of those too...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •