Will be going to 5 day northern lights photo trip next month. Will post some from that trip then to see how it performs on real auroras, not these mild southern ones
Will be going to 5 day northern lights photo trip next month. Will post some from that trip then to see how it performs on real auroras, not these mild southern ones
There is some definite coma, but it isn't bad and is gone by f/2.8. That shot is where it was most prevalent out of those that I took. I think because there were some brighter stars in the corners. A few other shots, even at f/1.8, it was much less noticeable, but dimmer stars.
Quick example:
Overall image:
Top left corner:
Sigma 14 mm f/1.8, 30 sec, f/1.8, ISO 400
I look forward it to it! Granted, I had a moonlit night, but I was pretty impressed with how much light the Sigma gave me. The minimal of vignetting was very impressive and useful.
Here's a review that I just came across:
https://amazingsky.net/2017/09/22/th...-14s-face-off/
Jonathan Huyer
www.huyerperspectives.com
Lake Savojärvi by Kari, on Flickr
Start of the 805 picture time lapse is taken with canon 24mm f/1.4 II but then the arc of the auroras went so wide i swithed to sigma 14mm f/1.8. Boy i love this lense and can't wait these 2 weeks to get to shoot auroras for real =)
4 second and iso 4000 f/1.4 with canon and 1.8 with sigma. Those are mostly satellites, one iridium flash close the end and few airplanes.
Posted one picture to the weekly and here is couple more to taken with sigma 14mm.
Norway lights 1 by Kari, on Flickr
Close to hammerfest lights by Kari, on Flickr