I posted a thread last week regarding the 24-105; it's on it's way for me to test. However, I'm wondering if I need to decide if I want a great outdoor lens with some decent focal length for landscapes/skyscapes or if I want a lens made for low light, indoor shots.

I have the Canon EF-S 10-22, 28-135 (which is what I need to replace as my wife is getting this), 50 1.8, 70-300 non L. I don't plan to get a FF body in the future.

Here's my pros and cons so far

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
Pros Cons
  • f/2.8 great for indoor photos/portraits
  • Many excellent reviews on this lenses sharp photos
  • Focal range overlaps the Canon 10-22 lens that I own
  • Focal range on the long end is fairly short for some of my landscape shots, primarily sunrise/sets


Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AF
Pros Cons
  • L glass
  • Good focal range for landscapes, sunsets, etc
  • Good replacement of the 28-135 that I own now
  • f/4 which is fine for outdoor photos but not for indoor portraits

    • I could use the 50 1.8 for that but it lacks zoom

Mods: If this should be merged with my other thread, please do so.

I'm looking for advice and suggestions, etc. Thank you,