Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Lens vs Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM

[elmo_2006]

I was thinking of upgrading to the new 3.5 version but I've read in a couple of flikr forums that it's not worth the upgrade.


Here I've used the Sigma 10-20mm 4-5.6 EX DC HSM version, both taken in the Seychelles.


@ 10mm ISO 200, 1/320 @ f/13 -1EV, cropped.


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.28.98/Seychelles.jpg[/img]





@ 10mm ISO 200, 1/250 @ f/13 0EV, cropped.


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.28.98/Seychelles_2D00_2.jpg[/img]


[]

[richm]

I've only had the pleasure of using the Canon, and have really enjoyed it for "urban" photography. It is remarkable and provides excellent image quality in a solid package. I've borrowed it a few times from my bro-in-law, and is a great compliment to my 24-105 and 70-200, and feels "almost" L quality. Here are few of my favorites.


Rich


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.25.10/IMG_5F00_0497_5F00_sm.JPG[/img]





[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.25.10/IMG_5F00_8238_5F00_sm.JPG[/img]


[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.25.10/NYCTrinityCemetery_5F00_sm.JPG[/img]