Originally Posted by ddt0725
It's worth it. You can't spend $1100 in photography for anything better. If I were you I wouldn't buy more lenses. But that's just me.
Originally Posted by ddt0725
I can't tell you for sure, but that lens is probably either a bad copy, in poor physical condition, or the whole deal is a scam. Avoid "ridiculous" pricing. If it seems to good to be true, it is []
Originally Posted by ddt0725
I'd use your 55-250 and 300 f/4. Your 100 is too short. The 300 f/4 is a bit too long, but has Mode 2 (panning) IS. However, I would use the 55-250 as primary telephoto. That's my opinion [H]
brendan