Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: If you could Have only One

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    274

    Re: If you could Have only One



    24-105 (On a full frame).


    17-55 (On a crop).

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    1,246

    Re: If you could Have only One



    24-70 2.8

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    779

    Re: If you could Have only One



    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Setters


    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    But, to answer your question, for a 1.6x crop body it would be the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. On a FF body it would be the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L.

    I think I'd have to agree with your selections, neuro.
    <div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

    I think so too... the 24-105 beats out the 24-70 in terms of IS and reach, and I think it has better control of CA outside of the focal plane, and I really like the 24-105, and don't want to give it up if I can keep it, but... the 24-70, even if it is a clunky bastard with less zoom range, just makes me happy in ways the 24-105 doesn't (as much). To be honest, I wouldn't bitch about having either.

  4. #14

    Re: If you could Have only One



    24-105 f4 IS USM

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    763

    Re: If you could Have only One



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    Besides, aren't you always telling us to "get closer"? [img]/emoticons/emotion-4.gif[/img]With a 20' MFD, you might need a bigger back yard!

    Yes I am, because getting closer doesn't cost $12,000!

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    3,863

    Re: If you could Have only One



    Man, tough question! Debating between my Canon 100mm f/2.8 L IS macro and 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. I guess if I had to choose I'd go with the 17-55mm!

    Denise

  7. #17
    Senior Member bob williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central New Mexico
    Posts
    1,983

    Re: If you could Have only One



    Since most of what I do is outside---It's the 100-400L for me-----otherwise the 24-105, regardless of crop or not.
    Bob

  8. #18
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853

    Re: If you could Have only One



    Quote Originally Posted by bburns223


    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    Besides, aren't you always telling us to "get closer"? [img]/emoticons/emotion-4.gif[/img]With a 20' MFD, you might need a bigger back yard!

    Yes I am, because getting closer doesn't cost $12,000!



    Well, for birds that may be true. But for shooting carnivorous animals in the wilds of Africa, 'getting closer' may well result in far more than $12K in medical bills.... []

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    763

    Re: If you could Have only One



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
    Well, for birds that may be true. But for shooting carnivorous animals in the wilds of Africa, 'getting closer' may well result in far more than $12K in medical bills.... [img]/emoticons/emotion-5.gif[/img]

    Meh. I could buy a closetfull of Ak47s for maybe $3k. Just Kidding.

  10. #20

    Re: If you could Have only One






    I'm curious to your compelling reasons for preferring a 17-55 over the24-70mm on a crop body?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •