Did this forum cause a backorder on the 135mm f/2?

[Colin]

Bryan said that the 24mm mkI and the 35mm (also mkI, I guess, but I don't think there's a markII) were of similar quality. I haven't had an issue with my 35 f/1.4, though maybe I just haven't used it in a context that demanding yet... Even so, given the price difference on the 24mm version, I think I'd keep the lens I've got than suffer the trade-in loss and price hike. Then again, I've often said that I was done buying lenses...


I didn't see the pictures of him peeing. I liked the helicopters too. There were a lot of pictures that made me think, "Man, I wish I had that kind of security clearance.."


The AMX panel was in the back right corner in the conference room with two wide screen displays in the wall.

[Daniel Browning]

That wasn't taken at OSP by any chance, was it?

Yes, it was! You can see the rest of the photos and videos on my OSP 2008 web site.

Is it really a huge difference between mkI and mkII.

Yes. Flare and corner resolution make the upgrade especially worthwhile.


Disclaimer: I love 24mm and use it a lot. I never used the Mark 1 on a full frame body with liveview or microadjustment;
I'm sure those would have helped the images I got out of the Mark 1. (I
upgraded to 5D2 in December at the same time I got my 24mmf/1.4 II.)

[HiFiGuy1]

Daniel,


I really like the shot of the older gentleman with the shock of white hair and beard seated in the tent.

[al mcb]

Not here in Oz, we still have them in stock at most dealers ...........I love the 135 but it is addictive .........











AL

[Fred Doane]

The 135mm F2.0 is now available at B&H.


http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=workaround.jsp&A=details&Q=&sku =112539&is=USA