-
Super Moderator
A few MTF comparisons, taken from canon japan.
Another interesting point: 24-105 f/2.8 - 11 aperture blades; EF 24-70 II and RF 24-70 - 9.
The bokeh and rendering I am seeing from that lens is stellar. Some features are complete overkill for me, but....I use an EF 500 II to take photos of birds in my backyard...so, you know, par for the course.
Last edited by Kayaker72; 11-04-2023 at 04:58 PM.
-
That looks really good to me!
-
Super Moderator
On the long end...
So, I know Canon changed their MTF process a few years ago, given that these do not have f/8, as the old MTFs did and they were taken directly off Canon-Japan's website, I think they are current. But, I am surprised that the 100-400 II the blue line at 400 mm (30 lp/mm) is higher than the 100-500.
Last edited by Kayaker72; 11-04-2023 at 05:09 PM.
-
Super Moderator
And finally...if anyone is discounting the RFs 10-18
vs the EFm 11-22
Not a bad little lens, especially for the money. 7 aperture blades. That is one of my issues with the less expensive lenses, but you aren't buying that lens for pretty bokeh.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules