Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Poor Dynamic Range from My 50D...

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    196

    Re: Poor Dynamic Range from My 50D...



    I should also note that it's easy to go overboard with HDR. First, not all scenes/images are amenable to HDR. (Some examples on the Photomatix site are a bit too much for me.) Second, one can play around with the parameters in Photomatix to come up with a really fake-looking image--e.g., lots of detail, but very flat.Third, it takes time--how much will depend, in part, upon your computer's speed. (Try not to run any other applications at the same time.) Fourth, the "improvement" you get (e.g., more detail in highlights and shadows) may not be worth the effort. I've done something like 150 HDR images but only a few are worth showing. (The images of the snowy street were not intended for showing to anyone, just for practice.)
    George Slusher
    Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
    Eugene, OR

  2. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    26

    Re: Poor Dynamic Range from My 50D...



    Actually, the sensors are analog not digital. The conversion comes after the image has been captured on an analog sensor.


    Of course, you probably knew that, but I wanted to clarify for readers that might not have known. I'll crawl back under my rock now.


    Ken

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •