Great post, electric eel. One brief comment:
Originally Posted by electric eel
That's true near the hyperfocal distance but for other distances, the DOF can be the other way around (2/3 in front and 1/3 behind), it depends on the specifics.
Great post, electric eel. One brief comment:
Originally Posted by electric eel
That's true near the hyperfocal distance but for other distances, the DOF can be the other way around (2/3 in front and 1/3 behind), it depends on the specifics.
Thanks Daniel, I wasn't aware of the switch, I'll definitely want to learn more about that, if you have any examples could you post?
Sorry, my mistake. It doesn't become the other way around, but it does slowly go from 50/50 out to 1/3, then 1/100:
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
With Canon 50D, 55mm focal length, f/16, 11 feet subject distance: 2.74 ft in front of subject (33%, 1/3rd), 5.45 ft behind subject (67%, 2/3rds).
The closer you get to infinity, the more it stretches out behind the subject until it gets to infinity:
32-ft subject distance: 15.8 ft in front of subject (1%), 1231 ft behind subject (99%).
The closer you get, the more it becomes 50/50:
3-ft subject distance: 0.24 ft in front of subject (46%), 0.28 ft behind subject (54%).
Thanks Daniel, I never paid much attention to the tables but it appears they are valuable, have you ever checked the tables against the depth of field markings on a lens, I wonder how accurate the markings are against the tables? Time to drag the older lenses out and check this.