Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: 70-200 F4 L IS or 70-200 L non-IS ???

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    299

    Re: 70-200 F4 L IS or 70-200 L non-IS ???



    Quote Originally Posted by Keith B


    My 2¢


    I wouldn't buy a lens at this focal length with out IS. So I would definitely take the 4.0 IS over the 2.8.


    I had the 4.0 non-IS and had a tough time finding uses for it. I have the IS 2.8 now and couldn't be happier. It is a beast though.


    If I were a wealthy man, I'd own both the IS versions.
    <div style="CLEAR: both"]</div>

    I always want to answer these comparison questions with the word BOTH, but it just seems too easy. It's really is the truth though isn't it? Do you want the EF300 f/2.8 or the EF400 f/2.8, answer BOTH. Do you want the 1DMKIII or the 1DsMKIII, answer BOTH. It's just sohard to choose.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    1,246

    Re: 70-200 F4 L IS or 70-200 L non-IS ???




    <div>


    Quote Originally Posted by Rodger


    Keith,


    Lets say you were rather wealthy and could make about $1250 over one summer after expenses were taken out.. would you be happy with the 70-200mm f/2.8 non IS?


    Oh, you're primary use would be sports, but you enjoyed shooting anything.


    -Rodger



    I'd be happy until I had to shoot something under 1/125 or so. If you are shooting with a camera that has lower noise at high ISO I'd say do the 4.0 IS. If not buy the 2.8 and save up another $500-$600, sell the 2.8 and buy the 2.8 IS. Nice thing is, the lens will hold a pretty good value if you don't beat it up.
    </div>








    Quote Originally Posted by Dallasphotog


    Quote Originally Posted by Keith B



    My 2&cent;


    I wouldn't buy a lens at this focal length with out IS. So I would definitely take the 4.0 IS over the 2.8.


    I had the 4.0 non-IS and had a tough time finding uses for it. I have the IS 2.8 now and couldn't be happier. It is a beast though.


    If I were a wealthy man, I'd own both the IS versions.
    <div style="CLEAR:both;"]</div>






    I always want to answer these comparison questions with the word BOTH, but it just seems too easy. It's really is the truth though isn't it? Do you want the EF300 f/2.8 or the EF400 f/2.8, answer BOTH. Do you want the 1DMKIII or the 1DsMKIII, answer BOTH. It's just sohard to choose.



    I am totally happy with the 70-200 2.8 IS. I think I'd just get the 4.0 IS for it's lighter weight.


    1Ds or 1D? I'd take the 1D. I think that would be the perfect compliment to the 5D2.


    Studio, clear shiny day = 5D2.


    Outside, beach, sports rainy = 1D3

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    460

    Re: 70-200 F4 L IS or 70-200 L non-IS ???



    Thanks for the insight Kieth.


    Thats probably what Ill do. Or if I find I really don' need IS, it wouldn't be a bad time to pick up a strobe kit.


    I'm sorry. Didn't mean to sidetrack the discussion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •