Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle
I will be doing all the video shooting with a tripod, so I thought IS will not be so important. But then it will be useful for photography...
Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle
I will be doing all the video shooting with a tripod, so I thought IS will not be so important. But then it will be useful for photography...
What I've read is that zoom isn't good for video - zoom rings on SLR lenses aren't made for video needs, and the air escaping/entering the lens can "corrupt" your audio. I've heard f/2 is the sweet spot for video.
A lot of engineering goes into video lenses - I think the 100x Canon zooms for broadcast video are internally counterbalanced, so zoom/focus never changes the lens' center of gravity. So yes, good lenses are worth their money; don't buy something that's not going to work for you.
We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.
Originally Posted by ddi
Yes.
Originally Posted by ddi
If it's for just video, you can get better results buying old manual lenses (e.g. Nikon), because they have much better manual focus features (rotation length, dampening, etc.). But if you need still and video together, you'll get the best results from prime lenses, especially L, because they tend to have better focus rings, less breathing, etc.