[quote user="DLS"]
[quote user="Jon Ruyle"]The inexpensive 64 gb 400x transcend [/quote]
Sorry to get off-topic here but, Jon, I
[quote user="DLS"]
[quote user="Jon Ruyle"]The inexpensive 64 gb 400x transcend [/quote]
Sorry to get off-topic here but, Jon, I
Good question, Damian - I remember some discussions on the a while back, but not if there were firm conclusions (my takeaway was that there can be bad cards from any manufacturer, but Sandisk and Lexar were the more reliable).
On a related (if no less tangential) issue, I'm not a big fan of large cards - a 64 GB card will hold >2500 RAW images from a 5DII (and more from cameras with fewer pixels). In the event that a card should fail, or get lost, or get chewed on by a dog, or whatever, that's a lot to lose - something grandma said about eggs and baskets comes to mind...
Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
Thoughts on Hoodman RAW? Not long ago I read where they were claiming Zero failures.
Edit: Hoodman's website claims Zero Failures still
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
Make that 2 in 32 No problems so far with mine- I've had it one or two months. Probably those whose cards fail are more likely to write a review. I've been using transcend cards for about 5 years now and never had a single issue, so I stick with 'em. The one card I did have an issue with was not a transcend. But that was a while back.
I bought mine on amazon, and there are no reports of failures of the 64 gb card there (though 2 report failures with the 32). For the 32gb 60mb/s sandisk extreme (chosen at random out of many sandisks on Amazon), there is one reported failure out of 15 reviews.
A lot of great comments here...
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
HD, I tend toward this line of thought as well...
I've used SanDisk for 4 years with no issues (4GB and 8GB sizes so far)....but I understand Lexar is another reputable manufacturer.
After all, didn't our mothers teach us to never put all of our eggs into one basket? []
My wife and I went on an Alaska cruise as our honeymoon. Admittedly, we went loaded for bear (four cameras, six lenses), and photography was a major part of our trip. That said, our disk usage exceeded my estimates, and began to approach the limits of what I had on hand.
We have six 8GB cards, four 4GB, and six 2GB cards. I
We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.
I have several CF cards, a couple that are very large: 4x 8GB, 2x 16GB, and 2x 32GB. With any of my cards, I download the pictures off of them whenever I have a chance. However, then I leave the pictures on the cards as well so once downloaded I have two copies of my photos, which I'm glad to see seems to be standard practice for most here. If I know I'm not going to have time to transfer photos, I'll switch cards even before they're full, just in case. Part of the reason I got the bigger cards is that it let me use bracketing a lot more and not have to worry about filling up the card too fast.
I primarily use the 16GB and 32GB cards. The 8GB cards are spread between a few bags so there's always a card in the bag, just in case I'm in a hurry and do something silly like forget to put a card back in the camera.
Whenever traveling, I keep the backups and CF cards separate (usually with one of them on me in a pocket). That way I will have a copy if the other gets stolen. Luckily this hasn't happened to me, but I'm always cautious.
I think it might not hurt to pick up another 16GB card or a couple more 8GB cards. I think with either the 96GB SSD or 500GB drive for daily backups you'd be fine.
I'd ask how you were going to transport your gear, but I remember your "Prevent STDs" thread, so I think you've got a good handle on it. []
- Trowski
Here's something to think about: if you run short of memory while in China, just buy another card.
After all, that's where they make 'em!
For what it