Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 39

Thread: Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT Not bad!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    778
    Ahhh. My bad For $600 it better turn my TV on too.
    Words get in the way of what I meant to say.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South West Ontario
    Posts
    466
    I would think that some enterprising third party manufacturer (PW??) will come out with some new toys for us to play with that will let us keep our existing flash units. I hope it is soon.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Mark Elberson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Medford, NJ
    Posts
    1,045
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocco View Post
    Maybe this explains why Pocket Wizards new trigger is so cheap.
    The PocketWizard Plus III is a "dumb" trigger. Even though it's cheaper than its predecessor it still makes sense that it can be sold for so "cheap".

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Croubie View Post
    there's no need for the ST-E2 anymore
    Auto focus assist beam. Other than that, I agree.

    Quote Originally Posted by iND View Post
    I understand that these can NOT be mixed with 580EXIIs they can not mix RT and IR
    Is that your understanding.
    So I will need to get all new flashes?
    Compatibility With 580EX II and Earlier Speedlites — Canon has done a good job of maintaining backwards compatibility with the existing line of Speedlites. The new 600EX-RT system works in radio mode or optical mode — but not both at the same time. This means that you can use the 600EX-RT with earlier generations of EX Speedlites by using optical transmission for wireless mode. Yes, it’s fair to say that, in optical mode, the 600EX-RT a better looking 580EX II.

    Check out this article for a comprehensive overview on the 600EX-RT

    Quote Originally Posted by andnowimbroke View Post
    Ahhh. My bad For $600 it better turn my TV on too.
    I don't get this...and I have a read a LOT of people complaining about the price point. The 580EXII is currently selling for $470 and that's with a $30 rebate. Without the RF transmission I'd say that the 600EX is a worth while upgrade. Nikon's flagship flash unit goes for $550 and does not have an RF transmitter.

    Quote Originally Posted by jrw View Post
    I would think that some enterprising third party manufacturer (PW??) will come out with some new toys for us to play with that will let us keep our existing flash units. I hope it is soon.
    They already have, they Mini/Flex system. I'll continue using it with my lowly 430EX IIs :-)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South West Ontario
    Posts
    466
    Wasn't aware that the Flex system is capable of supporting 5 flash groups which is the big upgrade item for me. Built in RT is a very worthwhile feature for moving forward, just want an RT unit that will allow using existing flash units in 5 channel system as it should cost less than replacing all my flash units. Would seem i have more digging to do.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Mark Elberson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Medford, NJ
    Posts
    1,045
    Quote Originally Posted by jrw View Post
    Wasn't aware that the Flex system is capable of supporting 5 flash groups which is the big upgrade item for me
    It doesn't. It has 3 just like the old Canon tech. It would be SUPER cool if Canon came out with an accessory like a FlexTT5 that could sit on older 580EXs and 430EXs, etc and allow them to be RF triggered by either the 600EX-RT or the ST-E3-RT. I feel like they would haven't mentioned it in the press release though. Who knows, time will tell. For people just getting into the game though this is great as I am sure that future units will be backwards compatible. I see this as a rather large leap forward in Canon flash.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    80
    Sounds great. The only thing I used to envy about Nikons were their flashes. No longer! Now all Canon should focus on is improving the sync speeds of their flashes.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South West Ontario
    Posts
    466
    It really is the 5 flash groups that have caught my attention. On a regular basis I have wanted 4 to allow key, fill, hair, and background lights to all have separate control. Don't think it should be too difficult to have 5 group RTs work with my existing flashes. Of course I have been wrong before...

  8. #8
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942
    Just picked one up. Looks like a flash, flash.
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  9. #9
    Senior Member Mark Elberson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Medford, NJ
    Posts
    1,045
    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist View Post
    I'll see how nicely it plays with the PocketWizard FlexTT5.
    Hopefully better than they play with the 5D Mark III :-(

  10. #10
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Elberson View Post
    Hopefully better than they play with the 5D Mark III :-(
    What's the problem there, Mark?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •