Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: 135mm anyone? ?

  1. #11
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942
    Too many choices, now I'm thinking about saving for this beauty...best ever..some say. 55mm forever.
    http://diglloyd.com/articles/ZeissZ/...us-55f1_4.html
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    East Central Illinois
    Posts
    850
    Those test images were shot on a Nikon D800E, which leaves plenty pixels for cropping. Nonetheless, very impressive IQ and an eye popping price to match.
    Mark - Flickr
    ************************

  3. #13
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,612
    Interesting that they are comparing it to MF. Opens the door to the question of is the sensor or the lens the limiting factor for IQ on the current crop of DSLRs. This would imply the lens is, at least at f/1.4 and on a D800E. My guess is that the MF reference is more of a ruse. Anyway, looks like an amazing lens. Photography...always leaving me wanting more.....

  4. #14
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,361
    The EF 135mm f/2 L has been on my buy list for a couple of years now. However, every time I get the money saved up to buy it, I end up buying something else.

    Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 II, Canon 5D Mark III...

    One thing that keeps me from picking up the 135L is that it doesn't replace anything in my camera bag - and I have no spare room in the bag. If I were to pick up the 135L and take it on a shoot, I'd have to leave something else at home.

    Dilemmas, dilemmas...

    :-)

  5. #15
    Senior Member clemmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bryan, TX
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Setters View Post
    The EF 135mm f/2 L has been on my buy list for a couple of years now. However, every time I get the money saved up to buy it, I end up buying something else.

    Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 II, Canon 5D Mark III...

    One thing that keeps me from picking up the 135L is that it doesn't replace anything in my camera bag - and I have no spare room in the bag. If I were to pick up the 135L and take it on a shoot, I'd have to leave something else at home.

    Dilemmas, dilemmas...

    :-)
    Sounds like you need a bigger camera bag
    Mark

  6. #16
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    Steve,

    If you want a 50 and want Zeiss rendering pick up the Makro Planar and call it good! I'm a Planar user and really like it, but for most the MP is likely the better choice.

    Dave

  7. #17
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942
    Don't think I could go that far for a 50, but it all depends on what other releases come our way. There might be a D800E beater just around the corner, well announcement just around the corner.

    I'm just about ready to go with the 135mm, I think I would get a lot of use out of that lens. The Zeiss is appealing but I think it is more of a tripod lens and not for shooting on the run.
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •