24-105-xsi 1/100 f4.0 ISO 100
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.33.50/IMG_5F00_6792-copy11.jpg[/img]
comments and advice are always taken.
--matt
24-105-xsi 1/100 f4.0 ISO 100
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.33.50/IMG_5F00_6792-copy11.jpg[/img]
comments and advice are always taken.
--matt
Another stunner Joel! The sharpness of that lens blows me away. That perch is starting to look familiar [:P]
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ben_taylor_au/ www.methodicallymuddled.wordpress.com
Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 5D Mark II | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Canon 35mm f/1.4L USM | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM |Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II |Canon 2 x Teleconverter III | Canon 580 EX II Speedlite | Really Right Stuff TVC 34L | Really Right Stuff BH55 LR | Gorillapod Focus | Really Right Stuff BH 30
Thanks I need to find some different dead branches to place next to the bird feeder .... the lens is very sharp and also it seems you can add more sharpness in post processing without it looking too over-done compared to my other lenses. The 1.4 extender doesn't seem to take much away from the lens performance as far as I can tell so far.
Originally Posted by btaylor
Are you judging from this small web sized image? If you are that is a common mistake, if the picture was very soft you would not be able to tell. Because there is enough detail inmost pictures to make a sharp web sized image.
Here is a link to explane what I am talking about http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/articles/judging_image_quality_photos_web.htm.
Great shot Joel.
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.22.91/0910_5F00_SanDiegoZoo_5F00_0496_2D00_3.jpg[/img]
Canon 40D, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Lens, 1/160 @ f/5.6, 400mm
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.33.43/IMG_5F00_0441.jpg[/img]
Canon 500D, EF-S 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 IS, 1/30sec, f/3.5, 21mm, ISO100
(No postprocessing, shot with 8 MPixels in B/W mode, can't remember the exact picture settings. First time in the woods with the new DSLR; after a bunch of really crappy shots I took a break and then tried to capture the mood of the place...)
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.32.28/IMG_5F00_3914.jpg[/img]
I have now reduced the image width to 800px. Hope they are displayed correctly now..
This one took me 9 months to finish...(a "4-season-panorama"). Have anyone seen anything like this on the web...?
Perfect stitching is ofcourse impossible. One have to comprimise.
Three mushroms.. a little bit tweaked in PS...and som PS-plugins...
An image shot with my Canon EOS 30D IR (converted to infrared, by LifePixel)
ArnsteinB,
Welcome to the forums!
They look like they are great images, but they need to be resized to display properly in the forum. I believe it's a 600px width.
One of the easiest ways I find to do this resizing is uploading my pictures to Flickr, and then grabbing the HTML and putting it in the HTML editor of the new post screen.
Interested in seeing them once they are resized!!
-Rodger
I was wrong and right. They're fine at 800px.
I was right in the fact that they're great!
I've never seen anything like the first one. Great stuff!
-Rodger