Here's one
Here's one
Originally Posted by maapu
Hi!
I liked the second one very much.
Alex.
Originally Posted by Don Burkett
Hi!
Very impressive. What a big difference from unrealistic "embossed" images.
Alex.
I was going through some pix I took last month and saw three adjacent similar pix in my Aperture3 files Two were poorly exposed, then i realized i must've bracketed them for a tone-mapped image. Here's what I got:
that sunset city/river shot is really wonderful. erno.
Hello to everybody.
I wonder, what should be the difference (in terms of exposure stops) to call image HDR?
Something tells me, that 6 or even 8 stops is not HDR.
May be, we can call it EDR (Extended Dynamic Range), while real HDR to start with double-digit numbers difference in terms of exposure stops?
Alex, as Reanimator today.
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.33.12/HDR-ship.jpg[/img]
7 shot HDR from a few weeks ago---Taken at the Bosque Del Apache in NM just before sunrise. I thought I had posted this before, but couldn't find it on this thread---
[img]/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.UserFiles/00.00.00.23.23/HDR_2D00_Bosque.jpg[/img]
Bob
Originally Posted by Don Burkett
Don,
What lens did you use for this shot? It looks exceptionally sharp and detailed. I want to know because I have a 40D, too, and many of my shots don't have this ultra-crispness to them.
Originally Posted by alex_sb
To be honest, a lot of people don't even get the true idea of HDR. Don't make it even harder [:P] Nah.. I get what you mean and to be honest High is a word subjective to your own standards, so make of it whatever you want. In the end it's all about the photo and it doesn't really matter if it's a HDR or normal photo I think?