Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Mirrorless

  1. #21
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,859
    Going on a family vacation next week, I just ordered the EF-M 18-55 for the trip (I have the 22/2 pancake already). I ordered the Lowepro Dashpoint 30 for the combo thanks to Bryan's review (I have the Dashpoint 20, ideal for the M+22).

    I'm also bringing the 1D X, 24-70/2.8 II, 16-35/2.8L II (might be its last use before I swap it for the new 16-35/4L IS), and 70-300L. But...we've got young kids and thus mostly daytime activities, I expect the little EOS M will see a lot of use.

  2. #22
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,612
    It's a great lens and combination. I hope you enjoy it. I prefer it to the 22 f/2.

    The fit in the Dashpoint 30 is tight side to side, especially with a filter attached, but face down works pretty well. Have a great vacation.

  3. #23
    After lugging my 6D, 16-35, 24-70, 70-300 and accessories including tripod to Majorca a few weeks back through the airport for a few holiday snaps, I'll be seriously reconsidering my options over the next few months - 6D and full kit great when I have the car, but also following the new flight checks introduced in the UK this week, I'm dreading unpacking my full kit in the airport scanning area :-/

    I've been waiting on a "better" option than the 18-55 to go with my 22, like a pancake zoom or a longer reach but given I'm seeing 18-55's for £80 on eBay (used) and £100 on Amazon (new) - it's time to stop waiting... Right, where's my card

  4. #24
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,859
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayaker72 View Post
    The fit in the Dashpoint 30 is tight side to side, especially with a filter attached, but face down works pretty well. Have a great vacation.
    Thanks! The fit as a 'mini Toploader' is fine, even with the EW-54 hood mounted in the 'in-use' position.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,179
    So now I am member of the "M" club. Bit on the $250 w/ 22 f2.0 special.

    Was able to play a little today and suffice to say quite impressed. Focus is fast enough for tourist pics, etc, certainly not a sports camera (Duh). The 22/f2 is a very nice lens.

    I played w/ the Tamzooka (you know I had to), the Sigma 50 A (actually pretty easy just to hold the lens and drive lightly w/ the right hand) and the 22mm

    Really a ton of imaging quality for what amounts to $120 for the body. Also runs Magic Lantern so I think this is going to be my timelapse camera.

    Link to the test pics on flickr

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/77760916@N05/
    Last edited by Busted Knuckles; 09-13-2014 at 11:38 PM.
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,179
    Bumping the thread for the link.

    The "M" is a fun camera. There is a vast difference between the M and what would be considered the "Pro" level of the Micro 4/3 market or the Sony from a feature set - BUT when worked within its feature envelop - which for other than sports seems to be pretty large. It has the same sensor as anything other than the 70D or 7DII.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/77760916@N05/
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  7. #27
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles View Post
    So now I am member of the "M" club. Bit on the $250 w/ 22 f2.0 special.
    I thought seriously about getting one when saw the latest sale with the 22mm. But hardly have enough time to shot what I have lately.

    Pat

    Sent via taptalk
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,179
    now that the weather in FL is getting barely civil I will start shooting more on the weekends. I plan to take the M w/ me on my business travels. I have been traversing Northern GA and S.C. the last couple of months and there are some pretty nice rivers, etc that I have had to pass on as taking the "big gear" is simply just too much.

    This is soooo small that w/ the 22 and the 40 (with adapter) likely to sit in a bag next to the door and may be with me a big percentage of the time... I hope
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  9. #29
    Senior Member iND's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ST LOUIS
    Posts
    400
    First of all I must say I have a small fortune invested in canon lenses, bodies, flashes and triggers for my professional photography.

    But for travel I want something less obtrusive.
    So I invested in mirrorless.

    On a recent travel to Greece and the Islands I did take my canon gear but brought a mirrorless for walk around.

    This was a very nice experience.
    I was no longer a photographer.
    I was a tourist, I was a street photographer, I was stealth.

    Now home in post processing I am very pleased.
    I have to look at the data screen to see which shots were with which camera system.

    I love the retro look, I love the range finder, I love the no noise.
    I love not sticking out.
    I love not having to choose a lens and concentrate on the composition and the exposure settings.

    I did not invest in the Canon M,
    I traveled with a Fuji X100S with a fixed lens.

    This will not take the place of my canon system for work, but will be my new walk around.
    I have no plans to get into the Fuji interchangable lens systems.
    With the Canon 5DIII and the Fuji X100S I feel I have two of the best cameras in the world.
    They just are for different assignments.

    I have images I would never had been able to take with the Canon.

    This has really changed things.

    Try it.

    I may been kicked off the site for talking Fuji praises, but this is real.
    I have lost all interest in looking at a Leica system after this experience.
    .
    Last edited by iND; 09-14-2014 at 08:49 PM.

  10. #30
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,612
    Quote Originally Posted by iND View Post
    I did not invest in the Canon M,
    I traveled with a Fuji X100S with a fixed lens.

    I may been kicked off the site for talking Fuji praises, but this is real.
    I have lost all interest in looking at a Leica system after this experience.
    .
    I've heard good things about the Fuji. Glad to hear it has worked out for you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •