Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 39

Thread: Canon 40mm f/2.8 STM sample shots

  1. #21
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,877
    Photozone has their review up. Looks pretty darn good!

    http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/752-canon_40_28_ff

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    759
    Well, the MTF from canon certainly looked promising, and PZ has pretty much confirmed it, razor sharp centres wide open and slightly better again stopped down a bit. I'd be a bit concerned about stop-down-focus-shift, but from f/2.8 to f/4 at anything normally framed (like 2+ metres away), that's going to be a non-issue.

    Now the real dilemma, next time I want to take out the Nodal Ninja for some spherical panoramae at f/5.6, do I take the pancake or the Samyang?
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.
    Gear Photos

  3. #23
    Senior Member Raid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    337
    Have just been looking at the ISO charts for this lens. To say that I'm surprised is an understatement. While I wouldn't use the "Razor Sharp" term it is very good for such a low cost lens.

    OK Canon, does this mean a new Pancake family?
    Canon EOS 7D, EF-S 10-22, EF 24-105L, EF 50 f1.2L, EF 70-300L, 430EX.

    "Criticism is something you can easily avoid, by saying nothing, doing nothing and being nothing." -
    Tara Moss

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    759
    My definition of 'razor sharp' is anything that outresolves the 5D2 sensor, at least in the centre at f/4-5.6, at PZ's 3700 mark.
    Like the TS-E 24, 24/1.4L, the Samyang 35, the 14/2.8LII, the 85/1.2LII (almost).
    I'm happy putting the 40mm Pancake in the same basket as those ones, and it's even cheaper than the Samyang and has AF too.
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.
    Gear Photos

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Terra Firma
    Posts
    158
    I've got the 35 1.4L and the 50 1.4, so I also don't need it. However, I have used the 35L mostly at state fairs, or other night photography situations, where I wanted something wider than the 50. I can imagine using the 40 pancake lens for the night shots. It will give me nearly as wide as the 35L (which I stop down to 2.8 anyway) and won't stick out of my 5D2 nearly as much. Hey, for $200, what's not to like?

  6. #26
    Senior Member dsiegel5151's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cape Girardeau, Missouri
    Posts
    339
    Just playing with the 40mm pancake. Nothing special.

    Empty bowl (almost)


    Tree in my backyard


    With 12mm extension tube
    My Flickr page
    Canon Eos 1DIII, Canon Eos 20D, Canon Eos T3i, Canon Eos M, Canon EF 400mm f5.6L, Canon EF 300mm f4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II, Canon EF 180mm f3.5L macro, EF Canon 24-70mm f2.8L, Canon EFs 60mm f2.8, Canon EF 50mm f1.4, Canon EF 50mm f2.5 compact macro, Canon EF 40mm f2.8, Canon EF-M 22mm f2, Canon 430EX II

  7. #27
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,877
    First time out with the new little guy, both taken with the 5DII:

    Name:  Balance Bike.jpg
Views: 870
Size:  143.4 KB

    Name:  Scooting.jpg
Views: 819
Size:  108.8 KB

  8. #28
    Senior Member Jayson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Nebraska, USA
    Posts
    1,906
    I just pulled the trigger on one of these cheap things also. I have the 35 f/2 and have never been happy with both the IQ and its focusing speed. I think if i like this, the 35mm is gone. I never need the extra stop anyway.

  9. #29
    Senior Member btaylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    No fixed address, how good is that!
    Posts
    1,024
    /sigh

    Looks like I'm going to have to spend more money... again.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/ben_taylor_au/ www.methodicallymuddled.wordpress.com
    Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 5D Mark II | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Canon 35mm f/1.4L USM | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM |Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II |Canon 2 x Teleconverter III | Canon 580 EX II Speedlite | Really Right Stuff TVC 34L | Really Right Stuff BH55 LR | Gorillapod Focus | Really Right Stuff BH 30

  10. #30
    Senior Member Dave Johnston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    451
    Don't know about y'all but I felt as though the af speed was Considerably slower with this compared to evn my 50mm 1.8. I had a chance to try one out in Kansas city, af speed is why I didn't pull the trigger.
    5D mark III, 50D, 17-40 f4L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4L ​IS, 28 f1.8, 50 f1.8, 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8 Macro

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •