Originally Posted by BogdanD
Pretty amazing at f1.8. Reviews indicate that the lens is not that sharp. ISO 11?
Originally Posted by BogdanD
Pretty amazing at f1.8. Reviews indicate that the lens is not that sharp. ISO 11?
Mark
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning />
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas />
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables />
<w:SnapToGridInCell />
<w:WrapTextWithPunct />
<w:UseAsianBreakRules />
<wontGrowAutofit />
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"]
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<mce:style><!
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
-->
<p class="MsoNormal"]Was going to throw this one out due to the exposure, but
while trying to minimize the preset menu in Lightroom, accidentally clicked the
“Black and White –Creamtone” filter......
[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/600x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/14/2112._5F00_MG_5F00_0012_2D00_2_5F00_001.jpg[/img]
....And decided to keep it. Shot it between a chain link fence
1/640sec at f/22
EF50mm f/1.8II
Canon 50D
Thanks everyone! It
Originally Posted by BogdanD
At what ISO did you shoot?
Mark
Originally Posted by clemmb
He used ISO 100. The picture is a Flickr link. On Flickr you can click on camera part on the information on the right where it says "This photo was taken onAugust 7, 2010using aCanon EOS Digital Rebel XSi."and you'll get the full EXIF. Or click "Actions" then "View EXIF data".
On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L
Originally Posted by DavidEccleston
Thanks. I am not familiar with Flicker. I clicked on the photo and went there. From my Firefox i can often right click and get the EXIF. When this does not work I assume the user stripped it.
Mark
Mark
Sorry! I didn
Originally Posted by BogdanD
It happens. I have fat fingers too
Mark
Mark
Originally Posted by clemmb
That why I pointed it out. Not everyone is going to realize the info is there. Flickr used to have a button called "Show more information" to get to the EXIF data. It was hidden near the bottom of the right hand size, in a small point size. In their recent redesign, it's moved to a very unclear spot. I mean, why would text indicating a camera model be a link to full EXIF? Maybe after the camera model it could say DETAILS, or EXIF, or MORE, but it doesn't. I don't find any of Yahoo!'s properties have nice interfaces.
On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="content-type" />
Great shot, BogdanD. The expression is priceless.
Originally Posted by clemmb
This is a 0.7 MP image corresponding to a 3 inch print -- wallet size -- so I don't think it really says anything about lens sharpness except "this lens is sharp enough to post images on the web or make wallet-size prints."I don't mean to pick on you clemmb, but I also don't want any other readers to get the wrong idea about this lens.
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="content-type" />