I found it odd that it lists the 70-200 f/4 IS as compatible with the x II but took that one out of the listing for the x III.
I found it odd that it lists the 70-200 f/4 IS as compatible with the x II but took that one out of the listing for the x III.
Originally Posted by ddt0725
Here was the last example of that I saw.
If you go to Canon's website, and go look at the 24ex macro flash
Go to accessories and there it shows a 72C adapter ring. This ring is for the 180mm L Macro...and it isn't even listed. Thats just one example. I have seen others. Canon's website isn't the greatest for matching things up. I think part of it is once information is published on an item, they never go back and update it when things change.
I would bet it is compatible, somewhere it will tell you that it is. But....maybe not.
Denise
Go here for the correct information
www.usa.canon.com/.../controller
Ok, the first lens to review didn't look like much of an improvement.
But the new charts for the 300mm F2.8 L....even the 2x III is looking alot better, this is making it a lot more attractive
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=249&Camera=453&Sample=0&am p;FLI=3&API=1&LensComp=249&CameraComp= 453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=1&APIComp=0
Interesting to see the difference. I certainly appreciate being able to assess these sort of things in advance. I
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote