Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 43

Thread: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Chuck, I have the G9 and love it, and your comment about the depth of field on a compact certainly makes sense, but it really doesn't match up to the 60mm EF-S on a 40D for critical sharpness.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    505

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
    I wouldn't put it that way. Focusing at a closer distance causes the drop in DOF. If you don't need to focus close, then the DOF will be the same with or without the extension tube. That's why I wouldn't say that the extension tubes cause a big drop in DOF.

    Daniel, don't get me started again. You know darn well that putting extension tubes on a lense, regardless of its focal lens shortens it's depth of field. Of course it's a function of subject distance. That wasn't the point.


    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
    Tilt-shift is the a great option. Another great option is focus stacking. The free software for that is great

    Do you have a link? I'd like to check that out.



  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
    putting extension tubes on a lense, regardless of its focal lens shortens it's depth of field.
    To me, saying "extension tubes lose DOF" is like saying "race cars cause fast driving". It makes it possible, and that's how most people use them, but it doesn't really cause it, per se. To illustrate:

    Fast driving is caused by the driver accelerating to high speeds. Race cars make it possible to achieve high speeds. Another way is stock cars. It's possible to drive race cars and stock cars at normal speeds, but usually people buy them to drive fast.

    Losing DOF is caused by focusing close. Extension tubes are just one way to focus close. Another way is to use a macro lens. It's possible to use extension tubes and macro lenses at normal focus distances, but usually people buy them to focus close.

    Am I being too pedantic?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
    Do you have a link? I'd like to check that out.
    CombineZM is the impressive and free stacking software. TuFuse Pro is another good option. Helicon Focus is the easy-to-use commercial software (30-day demo, then $30 to $200). Stacking in Photoshop is much worse than any of those options due to artifacts.

    It works best with a focusing rail, but I can get good results even with just the tripod and lens focus ring.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,156

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning


    To me, saying "extension tubes lose DOF" is like saying "race cars cause fast driving". It makes it possible, and that's how most people use them, but it doesn't really cause it, per se. To illustrate:

    Fast driving is caused by the driver accelerating to high speeds. Race cars make it possible to achieve high speeds. Another way is stock cars. It's possible to drive race cars and stock cars at normal speeds, but usually people buy them to drive fast.

    Losing DOF is caused by focusing close. Extension tubes are just one way to focus close. Another way is to use a macro lens. It's possible to use extension tubes and macro lenses at normal focus distances, but usually people buy them to focus close.

    Am I being too pedantic?


    I'd like to say "yes, yes you are". Race cars make it possible to achieve high speeds, but they can still go slow (they have to go slow to stop to fill up, change tires, go slow again before going fast). Extension tubes, on the other hand, FORCE shorter focus distances, and therefore FORCE short DoF. You say it's possible to use extension tubes at normal focus distances, but it's a fact that infinity focus is lost, and I've never left an extension tube on "for the fun of it". The tube is a very limited-purpose tool.
    We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by peety3
    Extension tubes, on the other hand, FORCE shorter focus distances, and therefore FORCE short DoF. You say it's possible to use extension tubes at normal focus distances, but it's a fact that infinity focus is lost,

    True, infinity is lost, but there's still plenty of "normal" focus range.If you focus at 1 meter, put an extension tube on, and focus at 1 meter, DOF is still the same.


    Saying that extension tubes lose DOF is putting the emphasis on the wrong thing. No matter what method is used to focus closer, DOF is going to be lost, whether it's a macro lens or extension tubes. The emphasis should be on the fact that closer focus (or higher magnifications) cause a loss in DOF.



  6. #26

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Daniel,





    I'm curious as to why you'd focus at 1 meter without an extension tube and then put on an extension tube to focus at the exact same distance? The whole purpose of the extension tube would be to allow you to focus closer then the MFD of that lens not at the same distance you just focused at.





    Fred~

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by Fred Doane


    I'm curious as to why you'd focus at 1 meter without an extension tube and then put on an extension tube to focus at the exact same distance?


    I wouldn't.


    Quote Originally Posted by Fred Doane


    The whole purpose of the extension tube would be to allow you to focus closer then the MFD of that lens not at the same distance you just focused at.


    Agreed.


    My point is that extension tubes don't "cause" thin DOF any more than buying a macro lens causes thin DOF. All types of
    magnification causes thin DOF. One method to increase magnification is
    to focus closer. One method to focus closer is to use an extension tube.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    779

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Wow, I didn't mean to start an argument that seems to not have any actual disagreement [] I meant to suggest extension tubes just so that you could focus closer to take pictures of models... close. That way, you can get pictures that get up close (to make small things look bigger) but also don't look like a telephoto close up shot.


    You'd certainly have to stop down, but you'd have to do that with a macro lense too. You'll have long exposures too, but she said she's using a tripod. I was just thinking that she likes her Macro, but the 60mm (on 1.6x no less) is contraining the field of view. To get similar quality, it's most cost effective to go with a prime, maybe even two primes, and provide the ability for macro-like magnification without sacrificing the field of view with extension tubes. Changing lenses and adding extension tubes when you need them (and taking them off when you don't) is kind of a hassle, but her subjects aren't exactly moving, and she's got a tripod most of the time anyway. That's my reasoning. I like extension tubes as an option. I think the Kenko ones I got are a good value. I'd prefer to have a 35mm macro lens, but getting 1:1 on a 35mm lens seems to require pretty much touching the subject with the front element anyway.


    Point and shoot seems like a good idea, just in that it can be physically smaller, and fit into places, though she's indicated that the quality available in such a scenario isn't what she's looking for.


    You could also get extension tubes for a 17-55 f/2.8 as well.


    So, yeah, I'd rather have macro abilities native to the lense at the focal length, but sometimes extension tubes just allow you to do what you want to do, i.e., get closer.

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    505

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
    Am I being too pedantic?

    If you mean "ostentatiously learned".......Yes.


    Sorry, I've been away for a day taking a seminar on lean manufacturing. Boy was that fun!


    Your race car analogy was quite interesting. I did some tests. It's all a mute point.


    Quote Originally Posted by Colin
    I like extension tubes as an option.

    Colin, to end all of this hullabaloo about extension tubes, I did a test last night using a 50mm Takumar and a set of M42 extension tubes. I set up my 5D on a tripod and tookphotos of apicture one of my boys had drawn. Thecamera to subject distance was aboutabout 2ft. I took two shots. Onewith the aperture set to f4then f8. Next, I unscrewed the 50 and addedone "10mm" extension tube and screwed the assembly back into the M42 adapter still mounted to the front of the camera. With the lens at infinity I could not get a clear image at f8 or f16.


    If you think a wide angle would work better I've got an old 24mm Soligor I can try. Just say the word. Otherwise, when a 10mm extension tube can decrease the infinity focus of a 50mm lens to under two feet, I don't see any practical use of an extension tube in the OP's case. She's looking for an inexpensive wide angle zoom with better IQ than the Sigma 17-70 she already owns. She comes here to ask for advice and the lot of us go off on tangents about extension tubes and depth of field. Her husband makes "models and props" not micro-nano-bugs. I imagine that some of the models and especially the props can be faily large. That's why the OP doesn't have enough room to use the 60mm lens. She needs more "fov" (field of view) not necessarily "dof" (depth of field). Obviously, increased dof comes from increased "fov". So, the most valuable suggestion made so far is the use of free stacking software to increase dof.


    Meanwhile, back at the ranch............


    ckw,will you follow up with my request from Monday?


    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
    That's why I'm saying you may want to hold off on replacing the Sigma 17-70 until you get a chance to work in a little sharpening. Is there anyway that you can post comparison images between your 60 macro and the Sigma 17-70 @60mm? Take two pictures of the same thing, both at f8. You may not need a new lens after all.

  10. #30
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,366

    Re: Looking for a sharp zoom *help? please?*



    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee
    Your race car analogy was quite interesting. I did some tests. It's all a mute point.

    *cough* moot point *cough* :-)


    Or, as Joey from Friends said, "Moo point..like a cow's opinion--it's moo!""

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •