Originally Posted by Colin
Yep, theysay that hippos kill more people than lions and a charging elephant is no joke!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USMa little long but I'm really loving my Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USMand can only imagine how cool the "IS II" would be!
T3i, Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8, 70-200mm f/2.8 L, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 430ex (x2), 580ex
13.3" MacBook Pro (late '11 model) w/8GB Ram & 1TB HD, Aperture 3 & Photoshop Elements 9
And don't forget the cape buffalo, or the rhinos...
Given the opportunity, i'd still want to shoot them, but...
If you're not scared, you're just that much closer to being dead []
[quote=Jarhead5811][url="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2.8-L-IS-II-USM-Lens-Review.aspx]Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS [b]II[/b] USM[/url]a little long but I'm really loving my [url="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2.8-L-USM-Lens-Review.aspx]Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L USM[/url]and can only imagine how cool the [url="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-70-200mm-f-2.8-L-IS-II-USM-Lens-Review.aspx]"IS II"[/url] would be![/quote]
My EF 70-200mm f/2.8<span style="color: red;"]L IS II came today. [] Although I've only taken a few shots with it, already I'm convinced that it's an amazing lens...
If I could have only one, versatility would trump all. I'd go with the 24-105 f/4 IS. Not the sexiest lens out there, but if I could only have one, that would be it.
Sheesh - 5 opinions so far, and not one vote for the EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye. C'mon people, get creative! [:P]
Peleng 8 mm
or, for Canon : 100mm f/2.8 L IS macro
the 1200 5.6 or the sigma 200-500 2.8
24-105 (On a full frame).
17-55 (On a crop).
24-70 2.8
Man, tough question! Debating between my Canon 100mm f/2.8 L IS macro and 17-55mm f/2.8 IS. I guess if I had to choose I'd go with the 17-55mm!
Denise
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote