I think we should congratulate Jan, he has succeeded where many failed.
He has confuse Neuro
I think we should congratulate Jan, he has succeeded where many failed.
He has confuse Neuro
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
You should include the picture next time []
For the same demonstration purposes I have a self-portrait with myself being 100% cropped. See how sharp my lens is at 100% crop?
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
Hahaha! Thanks, I feel honored []
Hehe I just come to think, it's not only confusion. He's probably going nuts by now thinking about all those posts where he used "100% crops" [:P] Haha sorry John[A]
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
You should include the picture next time []
For the same demonstration purposes I have a self-portrait with myself being 100% cropped. See how sharp my lens is at 100% crop?
Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
Hahaha! Thanks, I feel honored []
Hehe I just come to think, it's not only confusion. He's probably going nuts by now thinking about all those posts where he used "100% crops" [:P] Haha sorry John[A]
I guess my 800x533 crops from a T1i would have been 2.83240656% crops.
On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L
Originally Posted by DavidEccleston
Or 97.1676%....that's the big question []
I personally think it's a 97.1676% crop or either a 2.83240656% leftover [:#]
You want to learn a magic trick? [<)]
By the way, Wally I'm pretty sure that you must be so glad that you started this thread [A]
Good idea for Assignment 19: Create the most interesting crop of your photo
Originally Posted by bouwy
Wally
This is really quite simple. If you look at Jan's previous post where he croped 100% of himself out of the picture, if you then crop 100% of the background, then you will have a 200% crop.
Where 100% + 100% =200%
Rick