Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Is it a smartphone with a camera or a camera with a phone? - 41-megapixel camera?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304
    I still wouldn't suggest throwing your phones out of a driving vehicle

    @John, 450€ seems like a cheap deal. Newer top-model phones easily sell for that amount of money. Anyway it is in the 1100D+18-55 range

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    At one time I was a Nokia fan. I bought a new Nokia and was talking while driving (bad boy), accidently slipped and dropped it out the window. At 50 miles an hour it bounced and came apart. I stopped and picked it up, put the parts that flew off back on and used it two more years.

    The next three Nokia’s I had lasted about four or five months each before they fell apart.
    I am no longer a Nokia fan and it will not matter if they have 100mp cameras. They took advantage of their good name and started making junk.

    I will keep my iphone.
    I still think a scientific study is in order, throwing many different brands of phones out of the window driving at different speeds, to eliminate any statistical errors.
    I'll volunteer to be the driver, everyone send me your iphones and i'll happily send them flying at 200km/h :P
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.
    Gear Photos

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    Posts
    694
    And so do the Vinnish?

  4. #4
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853
    Thanks guys, that makes sense. At first, I thought is was just the neoclassical version of the theorem, like that big dome across the river from me, with the inscription "Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology."

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MIT.jpg 
Views:	131 
Size:	96.4 KB 
ID:	597
    Last edited by neuroanatomist; 02-27-2012 at 07:43 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    Posts
    694
    nice one, thanks Nevro.

    (I think we better stop)

  6. #6
    Senior Member ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    384
    I tend not to consider a camera phone decent unless they've gone to some measure to protect the lens. Sony Ericsson were good for that a few years ago.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,178
    Zeiss F2.0 lens - interesting. I am looking forward understanding this a bit more.
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  8. #8
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles View Post
    Zeiss F2.0 lens - interesting. I am looking forward understanding this a bit more.
    It's f/2.4, not f/2.0. There was a typo (or rouding) on some of the news stories.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    189
    A decent read describing the Nokia's sensor and their oversampling / digital zoom:

    http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/...one-camera.ars

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •