Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: f1.4 and f2.8

  1. #21

    Re: f1.4 and f2.8



    In my opinion, people who use prime for weddings use it because they are much much sharper than zoom lens. And i believe that they dont use the 1,4 aperture, they use narrower aperture. Maybe I'm wrong, but that is just my opinion.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    131

    Re: f1.4 and f2.8



    A quick piece of info...


    I have a Sigma 30mm 1.4 and a Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 with IS. For my purposes I have found there isn't much difference in the lenses. I'm not taking shots of fast moving objects and really, when I am I usually WANT the streaks I get (i.e. tail lights and such). I also like the greater depth of field as a result.


    So, what I use my "low light" lens for (indoor or backyard at night parties, night shots in the city) I don't really need the 1.4. I've even been thinking of selling it or trading it in for a macro.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    505

    Re: f1.4 and f2.8



    Quote Originally Posted by Cory
    Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 with IS

    Cory,


    The Tamron 17-50 f2.8 does not have IS if by what you mean is "Image Stabilized"


    Tamron is rumored to be releasing a VC (Vibration Compensation) model of this lens this fall.

  4. #24
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,361

    Re: f1.4 and f2.8



    Quote Originally Posted by Deva207


    In my opinion, people who use prime for weddings use it because they are much much sharper than zoom lens. And i believe that they dont use the 1,4 aperture, they use narrower aperture. Maybe I'm wrong, but that is just my opinion.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Actually, wedding photographers many times use the widest aperture they can. Most churches are dimly lit and a majority of couples don't want a flash going off during the actual ceremony. At those times, a very wide aperture helps tremendously.

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    131

    Re: f1.4 and f2.8



    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Lee


    Quote Originally Posted by Cory
    Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 with IS

    Cory,


    The Tamron 17-50 f2.8 does not have IS if by what you mean is "Image Stabilized"


    Tamron is rumored to be releasing a VC (Vibration Compensation) model of this lens this fall.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>





    Heh, that's the SECOND time I've done that and I know better. Wishful thinking / Freudian slip. A friend just bought the Canon EF-S 17-55mm 2.8 IS USM and my mind seems to keep sticking on that.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    505

    Re: f1.4 and f2.8



    Quote Originally Posted by Cory
    Heh, that's the SECOND time I've done that and I know better. Wishful thinking / Freudian slip

    I thought that exact thing when I read your post......LOL []


    I wanted to make sure we didn't excite any newbies.


    Funny, your wishful thinking has been fulfilled....how prophetic dude!!


    Please slip and say "my 5D MkII with in-camera sensor stabilization" Please say it....Please say it.....over and over.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •