Page 47 of 73 FirstFirst ... 37454647484957 ... LastLast
Results 461 to 470 of 1477

Thread: Post Your Best Nature Shots!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Steph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Geneva, CH
    Posts
    143
    Very nice indeed! What are the exposure values?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,650
    Thanks Bob, Jayson, and Steph. Always fun to get out and hike a little.

    Steph, I edited the post to include exposure settings. On the first, I probably should have used the 6 stop ND and stopped down. But it started off brighter and as I was shooting clouds rolled in, it got dark so I quickly tried to adjust, dropping down to f/5.6. The posted shot was the last one I could get before the rain.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110

  4. #4
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Brant - Your waterfalls just keep getting better. One question... why ISO 800 on the first one? It turned out good, but I was wondering why not go ISO 100 and less ND? In any case it turned out really nice.

    HDNitehawk - Those are big eyes, and rabits around here do not have ears that big. Really nice detail.
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,650
    Rick...good set. Really like 1&2.

    Lisa..good captures on the wildlife....


    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    Brant - Your waterfalls just keep getting better. One question... why ISO 800 on the first one? It turned out good, but I was wondering why not go ISO 100 and less ND? In any case it turned out really nice.
    Pat, first off, thanks. The reasons for ISO 800 were actually time and weather. When I first checked the exposure of the scene, I needed the 10 stop filter for a 30 sec exposure at ~ ISO 200 (which is hardly distinguishable to ISO 100, IMO). But, darker clouds moved in as I finished setting up and the first two shots were too dark. Rain start to fall during the second shot, so I bumped to ISO 800 and got the 3rd shot. By the time I got the camera back in the bag it was pouring rain.

    So, if the rain hadn't started to fall in the second, I may have adjusted to the 6-stop ND. But I had little time and it was faster to adjust ISO. I do know what you are saying as noise starts to creep in pretty quick on the 7D, especially compared to the new models. There was noise in the shot that I smoothed out in post.

  6. #6
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayaker72 View Post
    Pat, first off, thanks. The reasons for ISO 800 were actually time and weather. When I first checked the exposure of the scene, I needed the 10 stop filter for a 30 sec exposure at ~ ISO 200 (which is hardly distinguishable to ISO 100, IMO). But, darker clouds moved in as I finished setting up and the first two shots were too dark. Rain start to fall during the second shot, so I bumped to ISO 800 and got the 3rd shot. By the time I got the camera back in the bag it was pouring rain.

    So, if the rain hadn't started to fall in the second, I may have adjusted to the 6-stop ND. But I had little time and it was faster to adjust ISO. I do know what you are saying as noise starts to creep in pretty quick on the 7D, especially compared to the new models. There was noise in the shot that I smoothed out in post.
    Thanks for the explination. Your shot looks good and clean, and I wanted to make sure I was not missing some great waterfall trick that I was not aware of. I hate getting my 7D up to ISO 400, and seldom get to 800 (how I wish for a 5D). I agree with you regarding the difference between ISO 100 and 200.
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    28
    White tail deer
    September 03, 2012 by saslls, on Flickr

    coyote in the same field as above.
    coyote by saslls, on Flickr

  8. #8
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    I took this one last weekend at Green Bay Botanical Garden.


    2012_09_02_9107_upd by dthrog00, on Flickr

    Dave

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    3,863
    Seeing a Mourning Cloak in my garden is rare! Looks like this one has seen some wear on his migration journey ...


    Mourning Cloak by Denise Trocio ( www.dtrociophotography.com), on Flickr

    and a few monarch shots, I apologize if I already posted these in another thread ...


    Yet another monarch shot! by Denise Trocio ( www.dtrociophotography.com), on Flickr


    Male Monarch by Denise Trocio ( www.dtrociophotography.com), on Flickr

  10. #10
    Senior Member bob williams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central New Mexico
    Posts
    1,983
    Denise, I missed the butterfly shots, sorry so late. All are great shots, But I really like the last one. Those frames are starting to grow on me and the one you chose for that last shot really adds to an already great photo.
    Bob

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •