Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle
Jon, Explain....... what the heck are you talking about?Are you saying that sensor noise is a function of aperture?
Rob Galbraith has some high ISO comparison images shot with an 85 f1.2 @ f1.8 of the same event with the 5D MkII and 7D (beta). Are you saying that if he had shot the 5D at f2.8 instead of f1.8 the ISO would have tobe increased for same exposure, resulting in more noise? If that's what you mean then the answer is clear from these sample photos. The 5D MkII still kicks butt and takes names. ISO 3200 to me looks much cleaner then the 7D at ISO1600. That's a one stop advantage.
Originally Posted by btaylor
After seeing a sample of images from the 7D I would say if your a jpeg shooter your going to be OK. It'll be interesting to see if third party raw development software can compete with DigicIV for cleanliness. After all is said and done,FF for low light is still #1.
I hope the guys at dpreview do a noise comparison chart.


Reply With Quote
]
]
]