Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Is it a smartphone with a camera or a camera with a phone? - 41-megapixel camera?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member clemmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bryan, TX
    Posts
    1,360

    Is it a smartphone with a camera or a camera with a phone? - 41-megapixel camera?

    Mark

  2. #2
    Senior Member ham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    384
    Shame they've crippled it with Symbian.

  3. #3
    Senior Member clemmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bryan, TX
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by ham View Post
    Shame they've crippled it with Symbian.
    Ya, the article states that it will probably not hit the US because of this.
    Mark

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    I would love to see a comparison of this camera phone with one of the new $5,000 16 MP DSLR cameras with a top-flight lens. I bet that under certain conditions, the 41 MP camera phone would have significantly better resolution and a reasonable noise level.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    Posts
    694
    I am sure I will not even want anything close to 40MP for my smartphone snapshots. What will this be good for? To allow cropping? I wonder if the lens going to keep up with this.

    Arnt

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    Quote Originally Posted by ahab1372 View Post
    What will this be good for? To allow cropping?
    It looks like cropping (superior "digital zoom") is the primary benefit that they are marketing. I see laypeople trying to get a shot with their camera phone from far away all the time. This would actually let them do it in some circumstances -- you can't just make the lens zoom, because then the phone would have to become larger (and most people would rather have a thin phone with no zoom than a thick phone). This way they can have their cake (thin phone) and eat it too (zoom).

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    778
    I can barely edit my photos now using half the megapixels of that beast.
    Words get in the way of what I meant to say.

  8. #8
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853
    Quote Originally Posted by andnowimbroke View Post
    I can barely edit my photos now using half the megapixels of that beast.
    The default generates 5 MP images, which they bill as combining pixels to reduce noise. There's also a comment about taking a 41 MP image, but then deciding which part is most interesting and saving that crop. I'm not sure that you can actually save a 41 MP image at full res.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    189
    It doesn't say in the article how large a sensor this is. If you ask me all it's going to do with 41 MP is oversample the blur one gets with the typically crappy plastic, molded lenses in cell phone cameras. Yes, Nokia's cameras are on the better end but nowhere close to what would be necessary to get full use out of this.

    Short focal length plastic lens so everything is "in focus" then "digitally zoom" the area of interest. Certainly not in DSLR performance range.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304
    Pretty cool on paper!
    Quote Originally Posted by ChadS View Post
    Certainly not in DSLR performance range.
    Maybe not, but most probably it will be in DSLR price range

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •