Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    I've pulled the trigger on this bad boyandI'm in love with the output. The Mark I was great but the Mark II issimply amazing.


    BUT, Ihave a concernabout the IS on this puppy:


    I was taking some photos today in fairly good lighting, thethe IS when *winding up/down* would make a louder than normal buzz. I mean, typically it's a low buzz/hum, but this caught me off guard. Yes the lens was still capable of stabilising and achieve focuslock BUT the sound has me worried. It only happened a couple of times today. I flipped the switches from 1.2 to 2.5 and back again to no avail. I then decided to power cycle the camera and the loud buzz is no longer present.


    I'll be heading out on vacation in about a month and the lens is less than a week old and the last thing I need is to possibly have the IS *jam* up in the middle of a photo shoot!


    Suggestions/comments are more than welcome.....


    Thanks
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,156

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    1.2/2.5 is focus distance, not IS, so I don't know if there could be a relation there.


    Suggestions? You can send it to Canon for a problem that no longer exists in the hope they find the problem if/when they disassemble it, but you might get it back no-problem-found (and after-you-leave). Or you can hang onto it and send it to Canon if/when it acts up in a manner that you can't coax away. Unfortunately it's your call.
    We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    I don't know how much louder than normal it was... mine has some variation: sometimes it gets a bit louder. Does "louder than normal" mean much louder than the mk 1?


    I don't really know, but my gut reaction is... relax, man Enjoy your awesome new lens!






  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Quote Originally Posted by peety3
    <div style="margin-bottom: 14pt;"]1.2/2.5 is focus distance, not IS, so I don't know if there could be a relation there.</div>
    <div style="margin-bottom: 14pt;"]Suggestions? You can send it to Canon for a problem that no longer exists in the hope they find the problem if/when they disassemble it, but you might get it back no-problem-found (and after-you-leave). Or you can hang onto it and send it to Canon if/when it acts up in a manner that you can't coax away. Unfortunately it's your call.</div>


    Yeah, just thought I would test the waters...maybe I should head back over to Henry's for an exchange just to be on the safe side, I just hate returning/exchanging items if not necessary!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Ruyle


    I don't know how much louder than normal it was... mine has some variation: sometimes it gets a bit louder. Does "louder than normal" mean much louder than the mk 1?


    I don't really know, but my gut reaction is... relax, man Enjoy your awesome new lens!



    LOL, your gut maybe right, I'll try to recreate the problem, but I guess a slight variation in sound is ok from time to time, at least I'll know it's functioning...[:P]...but since the lens is less than a week old, I'll play it safe and return for an exchange as mentioned above.


    LOL...now I'm sounding like a *drama queen*...thanks for the suggestions!
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Quote Originally Posted by elmo_2006
    LOL...now I'm sounding like a *drama queen*...thanks for the suggestions!

    You sound kinda like I do when I get something new



  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Update...


    I've exchanged the lens at Henry's and this one is quiet than ever, wow, but now I find thatmy XSisometimes cannot obtain focus lock. I was out in the yard at around 3:00pm, lots of sun and heat and I was snapping up photos of flowers, but sometimes the camera would not obtain focus lock on anything - talk about a crap shoot!


    Talk about bad luck. I then quickly attached the 24-105 and had no issues with focus lock.


    The current setup...Av, spot, AI Focus, Auto ISO, center focus.


    It can't be the lens, not twice in a row! I think I want my original lens back.


    Anyone with ideas, as I'm close to reverting to the *fetal position*!
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    195

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Quote Originally Posted by elmo_2006
    but sometimes the camera would not obtain focus lock on anything

    Were you inside of the minimum focusing distance by any chance?


    Tom

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Hi Tom...


    No I was not, most of the times however; I was trying to capture the subject on the long end of the zoom.


    This is very frustrating...
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

  9. #9
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,853

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Wertman
    Were you inside of the minimum focusing distance by any chance?
    <div>


    Quote Originally Posted by elmo_2006
    No I was not
    </div>


    Tom's question occurred to me also, so I'll ask a follow up - were your subjects closer than the distance set by the focus limiter? Thereis afocus limiter switch with settings of 1.2m - &infin; and 2.5m - &infin;. So, if the switch was in the 2.5m- &infin; position you would not be able to AF on anything closer than 2.5m, even though the MFD for the lens is 1.2m.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    Re: 70-200 Mark II - I've Gone & Done It!



    Hi Neuro...


    The switch was set to 1.2 and the subject was more than 2.5m away.


    I performed some basic tests and the lens is neither front/back focusing. With the original lens I was able to zoom in and obtain lock on a vine leaf, with this lens, it's having a hard time obtaining lock. I have to constantly keep pressing the button to find lock.


    Could this be camera body related or lens or both? The 24-105 does not exhibit this issue.
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •