Hi Community,




I'm thinking of optimizing my Lens Option and Need yor help with this.



I'm shooting with a 7D As a hobby (Not professionally): Portraits, Sports, Family Events and when travelling (twice a Year) landscapes and Wildlife



I happy to Call the followings lenses my own:

10-22(EF-S)

24-105L

70-200 2.8L IS II

85 1.8

100 2.8L IS Marco




The 100-400 is an Option to enhance my Wildlife Fotography but I wanz to wait for Next Year with that.



FF is an Option in the near Future (that is Why the 24-105 and Not a 15-85) but I want to first explore the full possibilities of the 7D.



I guess the setup is well balanced and a good setup. What is kicking my mind is still to Optimize that Set (it is a Never Endung Story right?).
So what is your opinion on switching to the following Set?



10-22(EF-S)

24-105L

70-200 4L IS

85 1.2L

100 2.8L IS Marco

135 2L




The reason Why thinking about that setup:
70-200 4 is Not As Heavy As the 2.8 so Beter for travelling.
The missing 2.8 Aperture is compensated for Portraits by the 85 L and the 135 L for Sports. Beside the weight each Lens will outperform the 70-200 2.8 on their Main application areas.



Disadvantages I See:
Do I really Travel with lese Weight? If I have to take the 70-200 + 85 or/and 135 it won't help. As Sion As I got the 100-400 I might leave the 70-200 at Home anyway.



Any thoughts?



Christian