Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: (Megapixels) War...what is it good for....

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #27
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,593
    Just updating this table with the actual R5 pixel counts. Only a very minor change.

    Camera Megapixels Horizontal Pixels Vertical Pixels Horizontal PPI at 24 inches Horizontal PPI at 24 inches Horizontal inches at 150 ppi Vertical inches at 150 ppi Horizontal inches at 300 ppi Vertical inches at 300 ppi
    5DIII 22.3 5760 3840 240 160 38.4 25.6 19.2 12.8
    5DIV 30.4 6720 4480 280 187 44.8 29.9 22.4 14.9
    1DX III 20.2 5472 3648 228 152 36.5 24.3 18.2 12.2
    R5 45 8192 5472 341 228 54.6 36.4 27.3 18.2
    Rumored High MP 82.7 11136 7424 464 309 74.2 49.5 37.1 24.7
    7D 18 5184 3456 216 144 34.6 23.0 17.3 11.5
    M3 24.2 6000 4000 250 167 40.0 26.7 20.0 13.3
    M6 II 32.5 6960 4640 290 193 46.4 30.9 23.2 15.5
    G7X II 20 5472 3648 228 152 36.5 24.3 18.2 12.2


    With small birds, I am finding myself some of the time cropping down to ~1/9th of the frame. Smaller than that, regardless of the number of pixels, AF precision and the grain/size of noise becomes more of an issue. So, I also played with those numbers:

    Camera Horizontal Pixels Vertical Pixels Megapixels Horizontal PPI at 24 inches Vertical PPI at 24 inches Horizontal inches at 150 ppi Vertical Inches at 150 ppi Horizontal Inches at 300 ppi Vertical Inches at 300 ppi
    5DIV 2240 1493 3.3 93 62 14.9 10 7.5 5
    R5 2731 1821 5 114 76 18.2 12.1 9.1 6.1
    Rumored R"HP" 3712 2475 9.2 155 103 24.7 16.5 12.4 8.2
    1DX III 1824 1216 2.2 76 51 12.2 8.1 6.1 4.1
    M6 II 2320 1547 3.6 97 64 15.5 10.3 7.7 5.2

    So, take it as you will. I think, if I do get a new camera, my next camera will be more about AF speed/tracking/precision. Personally, it really would take something extreme like the rumored "High MP" camera to make much of a difference to me in terms of megapixels. If Canon could pull that camera off with even 5 or 6 fps, then you could still get a 24x16 inch print at 150 ppi when taking 1/9th of your frame, which is amazing. Granted. I only have about 8 of prints the size of 24x16 around my house and most where taken with either my 7D or 5DIII.

    I also have to say, I am appreciating the M6 II more and more, which is why I am willing to take it as my second camera to Yellowstone. If you want pixels on target, it is hard to beat.
    Last edited by Kayaker72; 07-14-2020 at 04:08 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •