I posted a thread last week regarding the 24-105; it's on it's way for me to test. However, I'm wondering if I need to decide if I want a great outdoor lens with some decent focal length for landscapes/skyscapes or if I want a lens made for low light, indoor shots.
I have the Canon EF-S 10-22, 28-135 (which is what I need to replace as my wife is getting this), 50 1.8, 70-300 non L. I don't plan to get a FF body in the future.
Here's my pros and cons so far
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM
Pros Cons
- f/2.8 great for indoor photos/portraits
- Many excellent reviews on this lenses sharp photos
- Focal range overlaps the Canon 10-22 lens that I own
- Focal range on the long end is fairly short for some of my landscape shots, primarily sunrise/sets
Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AF
Pros Cons
- L glass
- Good focal range for landscapes, sunsets, etc
- Good replacement of the 28-135 that I own now
- f/4 which is fine for outdoor photos but not for indoor portraits
- I could use the 50 1.8 for that but it lacks zoom
Mods: If this should be merged with my other thread, please do so.
I'm looking for advice and suggestions, etc. Thank you,