We all know there is a rumour going on about the 17-40mm f4L Mark II. Eg.:[url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-17-40-f4l-ii-cr3/]http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/01/ef-17-40-f4l-ii-cr3/[/url]


But if the case is that it has 82mm filter diameter, I'd better stick with the original 17-40.

It would be a pain to change all my 77mm filter collection to the 82mm ones!

<p class="justify"]Probably some of you wouldn't mind if you only have UV and polariser (and you do the rest in post-processing).
<p class="justify"]
Does anyone else worrying about the filter diameter size like I did?