This will prove to most that I am an anarchist....or at least a dullard. And given the very detailed and insightful session on pixel physics (still haven't re-assembled all the grey matter that leaked out when my head exploded - I think some is permanently missing) I am a little wary of opening this can of worms....

I found myself recently having to look at the ND filter world in order to get the exposure settings I wanted. Too much light - who would have thought.... (Any suggestions would be appreciated on the quality ND set)

So why is it we discuss the other end of the spectrum, noise concerns, etc, I suspect more people push the higher iso limits, but we also have 1/8000 shutter speeds. I suspect the ISO 50 would be used more than the 1/8000?

Are there too few people looking for longer exposures in bright light? f22 has a significant image degradation and sometimes we don't want that forever DOF.... Or is there a physics thing again.

Thanks

Mike