Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: canon 100-400mm lens, should I at £990?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8

    canon 100-400mm lens, should I at £990?

    I've seen a really good offer for the 100-400 lens, it basically puts the price at £990 (uk price)

    Now should I buy it? From what I've been reading is that everyone loves this lens, its versatile and produces great pictures but, correct me if I'm wrong, rumors float around about a possible mark ii or this lens?

    I'll probably go ahead and buy the lens but is there any reason why i shouldn't?

    thanks for your advice and comments.

    A

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8
    Thanks for your reply. The reason I ask is that I will be taking this lens to Antarctica but in over a years time. I've only heard good things about this lens and I also own the 24-105, but the offer at the moment is too good to turn down in my opinion.

  3. #3
    Senior Member clemmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bryan, TX
    Posts
    1,360
    Quote Originally Posted by parmara007 View Post
    Thanks for your reply. The reason I ask is that I will be taking this lens to Antarctica but in over a years time. I've only heard good things about this lens and I also own the 24-105, but the offer at the moment is too good to turn down in my opinion.
    I agree. For a trip to Antarctica this would be a great lens to have on your camera.
    By the way, welcome to the forum. What camera body do you have? Tell us a bit about yourself. Fill out the About Me on your profile.
    Look forward to some images from Antarctica next year.
    Mark

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    8
    I forgot to do that but will do.

    I will be running the 5D3 when I've eventually upgraded to it but I've been using the 450d for years when I started off in photography. I'm actually in the process of upgrading my whole kit for this trip. I'll be adding the 16-35 f2.8.

  5. #5
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,878

    canon 100-400mm lens, should I at £990?

    It's a great lens. A new version has been rumored for several years but has not appeared. If one does, it will likely be double that price. I say get it...

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Melbourne,Australia
    Posts
    60
    Based on rumors there are 2 patents that exist for this Lens's mark 2 version. and one of them is a Ring Style zoom rather than the push-pull design.

    I rented this lens a while ago and optically there is nothing I can fault on this lens. My only issue was the Jerking off action of the Push-Pull design (using such a design for the first time)

    I am waiting for the ring type zoom version of this lens but I can wait as I am in no hurry at all. I guess (my personal opinion) it would be worth putting an extra 200-300 dollars for the new design (If it comes out).

  7. #7
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,878
    Quote Originally Posted by DSLR_Newbie View Post
    I guess (my personal opinion) it would be worth putting an extra 200-300 dollars for the new design (If it comes out).
    I like your optimism, but $600-800 extra might be more likely...

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    155
    I have the lens and find the focal range is perfect for my needs. Mostly that is grand kid sports and occasional wildlife. I was worried about the push-pull zoom, but have gotten used to it. Just keep the tension adjustment loose enough to slide easily but not slip.

    Larry

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •