Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Sigma 50-500mm OS vs. Canon 100-400mm IS

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    23

    Cool Sigma 50-500mm OS vs. Canon 100-400mm IS

    Hi there,

    Quite simply I would like to know which of these lenses comprehensibly produces 'nicer' looking pictures - e.g. sharpness, contrast, bokeh, IS etc. - I have heard mixed comparisons of both and am therefore pretty confused. Which is the better lens?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    576
    Hey there. I started to look at it.. and it got pretty clear right off. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=113&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API= 2&LensComp=374&CameraComp=9&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=1 &APIComp=2

    T
    hose are Bryan's ISO crops for sharpness. Great tool. Doesn't look like he's done a review on the lens, but he has at least done that much.

    Personally, I'm not familiar with the Sigma. Is it in the same price range as the 100-400? You'll find a bunch of advocates of that lens on this site.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    23
    Yep, they pretty much cost the same in the UK - £1000 +-£200 each way.

  4. #4
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,888
    Love my 100-400mm!

    Rocco, the comparison you linked isn't relevant for two reasons - one, it's the non-OS version of the Sigma, the OP is asking about the OS version. Second, you've got two different cameras selected in the drop down - if you pick the 1Ds II for both (that's the only one on which Bryan tested the non-OS Bigma), the IQ difference isn't that much.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    576
    Haha! That's what happens when I browse the internet at 3am. My bad.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    293
    Quote Originally Posted by JTPAIN View Post
    Hi there,

    Quite simply I would like to know which of these lenses comprehensibly produces 'nicer' looking pictures - e.g. sharpness, contrast, bokeh, IS etc. - I have heard mixed comparisons of both and am therefore pretty confused. Which is the better lens?
    Hi...

    You can check out the reviews here and here.

    The Sigma or *Bigma* is considered a contender but I doubt that it can beat the Canon 100-400L however; for the price and the 10x zoom factor it does well if without it shortcomings like it's vignetting and AF issues at the long end.

    Please note that I recall a Sigma Service Bulletin whereby Sigma had issues with the AF system on some of there telephoto lenses. I'm not sure if that was addressed - one would assume it was.

    On Flikr, there is a user that goes by the name *Airforcehound* or something and his go to lens was this lens until a recent mishap. You want to search there, the photos look great!

    I personally don't have one, but I was curious about some of Sigma's telephotos including the 150-500.
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •