Results 1 to 10 of 232

Thread: R5? R6? Anyone?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Throgmartin View Post
    Good God f/11 is slow. I'd say for photographing birds lenses that are so slow would be virtually unusable if you want to shoot at any reasonable ISO.

    I take photos of bald eagles a few times each winter. 1/1500 shutter is a good starting point to get sharp shots. What ISO would I have to use to shoot wide open at 1/1500? Too high

    Dave
    I don't think you would have a problem on a sunny day. You are getting what you pay for.

    The question is how good will the IQ be.

    The MTF of the new 800mm:



    It would be a cheap way to get in to wildlife photography.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    I don't think you would have a problem on a sunny day. You are getting what you pay for.

    The question is how good will the IQ be.

    The MTF of the new 800mm:



    It would be a cheap way to get in to wildlife photography.
    I looked at a series of action shots from December 2018 @ late afternoon:

    1/1600 f/6.3 ISO 320 400mm

    If shooting at f/11 then roughly ISO 1000.

    Maybe they'd clean up decent, but I think it would be very limiting.

    Dave

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    437
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Throgmartin View Post
    I looked at a series of action shots from December 2018 @ late afternoon:

    1/1600 f/6.3 ISO 320 400mm

    If shooting at f/11 then roughly ISO 1000.

    Maybe they'd clean up decent, but I think it would be very limiting.

    Dave
    You really saying that iso 1000 is bad? I constantly use iso 5000-10000 on night time shooting and without stacking images i don't have any issues with it. Been shooting macros with iso 3200-6400 no issuess so really can't see what is the problem here.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Karsaa View Post
    You really saying that iso 1000 is bad? I constantly use iso 5000-10000 on night time shooting and without stacking images i don't have any issues with it. Been shooting macros with iso 3200-6400 no issuess so really can't see what is the problem here.
    Astro and BIF are quite different types of shooting. I am a cropped sensor birding photog and yes in my opinion ISO 1000 is pushing it if you want fine details in feathers.

    You may have superior post processing abilities than I have.

    Dave

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •