Need your opinion on a watermark/logo

[alexsommers]

Hi Everyone,


I am not a graphic designer and don't really have much experience with web design. However, I'm trying to update my watermark, and also use it as a header for a website I'm creating. I'm going for a simplistic look. I don't know if I am violating any major design laws with my creations so far. Please feel free to let me know which one you like better.

[Sheiky]

Hey Alex,


I personally like number 2 better. However I think both will do great, but for different photos. If you're more of a classical/natural photo kind of person, I'd say go with number 1. If you're more into new style(photoshop, artsy work, out of the box work), I'd say go with 2.


Jan

[Dave Johnston]

Alex,


I don

[alexsommers]

Thanks Jan and Dave for your responses! I

[piiooo]

I voted for "B"


I just think that two machine-generated- likekinds offontwill look more compatible and optically pleasing than a handwritten-like one and a machine-like one.


My 2 pennies...

[Sean Setters]

I would almost agree with piiooo, but I honestly don

[clemmb]

I like #1. I like a script font myself. I use one on my website: www.markclemphotography.com

[alexsommers]

thanks everyone for your suggestions and comments so far. I liked the script font with the regular font so I ended up with a combo. And as much as I liked the camera icon, I decided to leave it out and went with this instead.


[img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/24/4604.Alex-Sommers-Photography-logo-and-watermark-Final-for-website.jpg[/img]

[Colin500]

I like this much better than either of the original two! I

[nvitalephotography]

I agree...option C is by far the best one. good choice on that