A lot of great elk on this page, but you gotta love the one with the felt hanging all over the antlers. To bad he got all dressed up with ear rings and necklace for the shoot.
A lot of great elk on this page, but you gotta love the one with the felt hanging all over the antlers. To bad he got all dressed up with ear rings and necklace for the shoot.
5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
flickr
my thoughts exactly.Originally Posted by conropl
They really tagged the heck out of that elk. Are they doing research on those elk or something? I'm confused why they would need such big tags if they weren't monitoring them frequently. Was that with the 100-400?
My Flickr page
Canon Eos 1DIII, Canon Eos 20D, Canon Eos T3i, Canon Eos M, Canon EF 400mm f5.6L, Canon EF 300mm f4L IS, Canon EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II, Canon EF 180mm f3.5L macro, EF Canon 24-70mm f2.8L, Canon EFs 60mm f2.8, Canon EF 50mm f1.4, Canon EF 50mm f2.5 compact macro, Canon EF 40mm f2.8, Canon EF-M 22mm f2, Canon 430EX II
This elk is part of the reintroduced population in Smoky mountains national park. Its a small herd they introduced and they have a few biologists that are pretty much constantly monitoring the elks activities. 90% of the elk here are tagged like that. Its great for study purposes but not so great for photography.
and yeah, 100-400 on a 50d.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote