Forgive me in advance if this is a subject already started somewhere, but when I tried to search for it the search was for some reason unavailable tonight.
What is your work flow?
How many people have spent large sums of hard earned money for software such as Photoshop CS* and don
tkerr, I also use Photoshop, so here's what I do.
I used to use Elements (still have version 5 and recently got 8). Now I use Photoshop exclusively. DPP never appealed to me, since it was limited.
I download images with Bridge and keep the files organized in folders, usually by date.
I do adjustments in Camera Raw (much of the initial workflow involves CR, since this is where one can do a lot, BEFORE opening an image into PS). I tell Bridge to open as 16 bit files.
Then, open files in PS (CS5), and depending on the image, do adjustment layers, masks, etc.
Run actions on the images (batch processing, in some cases), then save as either TIF or PSD, then "save as" to JPG. JPGs get printed or sent to family and friends.
I had Lightroom, but found that Adobe Camera RAW did everything I wanted, and the organization in Bridge is fine for me.
I consider Photoshop to be worth every penny.
I have a fairly simple workflow.
1) Transfer RAW files from the card to a folder on my hard drive.
2) Do initial adjustments, batching when I can, in DPP. Convert to JPEGs in a new folder.
3) For the images I want to further post process, I open the JPEGS in Photoshop and polish up from there.
Now, I realize I may lose some quality going from RAW to JPEG and then editing. However, in my opinion, it doesn
Well, I have never even opened the DPP application. Not because I got something against it - I just don't have any need for it. As I mentioned in another thread, I have had some use for Aperture, but then I switched to Lightroom - full time. Of course, I also use Photoshop for more complicated tasks, but Lightroom became my main tool.
Bridge used to always get in my way, so I stopped using it altogether. Again, Lightroom replaced its functionality for me. I know, they are not the same, but for my purpose, Lightroom does everything I want it to do.
I hear a lot that the DPP gives better results with Canon RAW files than Aperture, Lightroom or ACR. I refuse to believe it. In my view, it does not matter much which application you use for routine adjustments and corrections. It depends more on your way of using any given app. When I have a need for more than routine corrections, I go to Photoshop.
As for my path from camera to print (or Internet), it is not as strict and automated as many would approach that. I have a luxury of more unhurried approach.
I start with downloading photos from the memory card to my external hard drive - always using card reader (never directly from the camera). All my photos are in RAW format, so that simplifies things a bit. I have a system for archiving my original photos, where I place them within folders in a hierarchy based on this scheme: DIGITAL > CAMERA USED > YEAR > MONTH > DAY > EVENT. I have separate hierarchy for my old ANALOG scans (I am sure this is not perfect or ideal or even most logical scheme, but it works fine for me). Then, I fire up Lightroom and import photos from folders without copying them to the catalog. Instead, I ask Lightroom to make an extra copy to a location on another external hard drive IN DNG FORMAT (just to be safe, for the future).
Then comes a routine of rating and assigning keywords. Corrections and adjustments come next. If I need JPEGs for Internet or for commercial printing, I export them to a separate folder. JPEGs never even enter my Lightroom catalog (unless I get some 3rd party photos from my family or friends for correction). After specific use, I simply delete them. If I need to print, I do it from within Lightroom. If I need a slideshow or a web gallery, I also use Lightroom for that.
So what do I need Photoshop for? Selections, masks, layers, channels, compositing. Other than that, everything is done with Lightroom.
I have to admit, that I still use an old dyesub printer which prevents me from using any kind of custom profiling. I am about to get rid of it and buy an ink-jet. When I'll do that, I will be using Photoshop for printing - probably exclusively, because printing from Photoshop is more color-managed and precise than printing from Lightroom.
- Pop the card in
- Run import preset in Lightroom
- Rinse and repeat
- Make rough metadata changes to dozens at a time (custom white balance, etc.)
- Generate 1:1 previews
- Go roast some coffee, mmm.
- Cull the losers and separate the "wow!" from the "meh."
- Fine tune in Lightroom.
- If Adobe isn't cutting it, switch to DPP, RawTherapee, or RPP.
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="content-type" />
Final modifications in Photoshop- Send to print
- Add keywords, ratings, etc.
Download from camera to LR, cull, make improvements (?) and then transfer to CS3 at 16 bits. If necessary a few more tweaks, crop and then save as jpeg.
I rarely to never use DPP.
I backup RAWs on my 2nd internal HD and then to 2 external HDs w/some of the WOW jpegs.
Firestarter; why do you "never directly download from the camera"? Maybe it is my imagination, but the pix seem to download faster camera to LR w/my setup.
Regards
Bill
Originally Posted by Daniel Browning
Oh, yeah, I forgot about that one. That is DEFINITELY a part of my work flow! []
Out of curiosity, What version of Photoshop are you using?.
Oh, yeah, I forgot about that one. That is DEFINITELY a part of my work flow! [img]/emoticons/emotion-2.gif[/img]
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>
That goes without saying, That's the first thing in my work flow. [
TKerr,
My workflow is simple as well
1: Card ----> folder on HD
2:folder----> to Lightroom 3
3: Organizing, scrapping, initial edits
4: Edit in PS as needed either as jpeg or TIFF (8 and/or 16 bit)
5. More organizing in LR
5. Export to HD and
That
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote