Originally Posted by
ZoeEnPhos
For example I find myself avoiding Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II and I rather use in real life in the field and outdoors instead the better Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L, because it delivers better IQ compared with the 14mm even version II when I closely work with them in my computer! I still lack a good 24mm and I have even avoided to purchase the EF16-35mm Version II ...I think I should go with L-primes rather...but I found the light weight EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM with one flourite lens element to BETTER than my new EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II - and this lens is now for a check up at the Canon Service center here in Stockholm because it could not deliver as sharp images compared to the excellent EF 70-200 f/L IS USM ...but again that may only be the case with this one I got now for only about two months ago...but I think the version II of EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM should be at least AS SHARP as the older 4L IS USM=?