Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: "Dumb IS" and monopods

  1. #11
    Senior Member btaylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    No fixed address, how good is that!
    Posts
    1,024

    Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods



    I'm in the "majority" boat by the looks of things as I use IS all the time except when mounted to a tripod (or when using a lens without IS [] )


    Quote Originally Posted by photosurfer
    Although i'm sure you do get a lot of people here trying to use IS at 1/2000 while sports shooting so i see what you're saying lol

    I understand that IS doesn't add any benefit in terms of camera shake once you reach high shutter speeds, but will leavingIS on while shooting at high shutter speeds actually be detrimental to the shot?


    At what point (shutter speed) does IS become useless?


    Cheers.





    http://www.flickr.com/photos/ben_taylor_au/ www.methodicallymuddled.wordpress.com
    Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 5D Mark II | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Canon 35mm f/1.4L USM | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM |Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II |Canon 2 x Teleconverter III | Canon 580 EX II Speedlite | Really Right Stuff TVC 34L | Really Right Stuff BH55 LR | Gorillapod Focus | Really Right Stuff BH 30

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chesapeake Virginia
    Posts
    281

    Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods



    Depends on how steady you are. I rarely shoot below 250 for sports and have no IS.


    I find that IS also tends to shorten battery life.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,956

    Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods



    Quote Originally Posted by btaylor
    will leavingIS on while shooting at high shutter speeds actually be detrimental to the shot?

    In addition to the battery drain, it can cause its own blur if you happen to take the picture while the I.S. lens group is moving.


    Quote Originally Posted by btaylor
    At what point (shutter speed) does IS become useless?

    I turn it off for anything above 1/500.





    "Because it tends to be counterproductive above 1/500. Everyone seems
    to think that VR has an infinite cycling time. It doesn't. It's
    sampling frequency is just above 1/500. Most pros turn it off for
    sports. "


    http://www.bythom.com/discipline.htm




    "VR off. In fast action, there is no time for the VR to settle, and
    it will still be "VRing" while you're taking the picture. Fighting you,
    rather than helping you. "
    http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1034&message=31828838

  4. #14
    Senior Member btaylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    No fixed address, how good is that!
    Posts
    1,024

    Re: "Dumb IS" and monopods



    Thanks Yoda! [Y] Can always count on you for an answer Daniel. I'll have to do some field testing and see the differences for myself.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/ben_taylor_au/ www.methodicallymuddled.wordpress.com
    Canon 5D Mark III | Canon 5D Mark II | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Canon 35mm f/1.4L USM | Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM |Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II |Canon 2 x Teleconverter III | Canon 580 EX II Speedlite | Really Right Stuff TVC 34L | Really Right Stuff BH55 LR | Gorillapod Focus | Really Right Stuff BH 30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •