Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Confusion and Suggestions for Wide Angle

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    325

    Re: onfusion and Suggestions for Wide Angle



    Quote Originally Posted by piiooo
    The Sigma 8-16mm was just announced 2 months ago, and is not available yet. Tough to tell if you will be able to get it by the summer.




    ApparentlyAbe's has it: <span class="small_field_value_nb"]<span style="color: #008000; font-size: x-small;"]Available ( Limited Quantity )


    http://www.abesofmaine.com/item.do?item=SG816AFC&amp;id=SG816AFC

  2. #12

    Re: onfusion and Suggestions for Wide Angle



    Canon 10-22 [Y]


    Had one, sold it with my 20D thinking I wouldnt need it once I bought the 16-35 L II. Wrong!


    Going to buy another one as soon as I can afford it. [*-)]

  3. #13

    Re: Confusion and Suggestions for Wide Angle



    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Setters


    And while the 10-22 is not known to be a fantastic lens for portraiture (mostly because of the distortion around the edges of the frame), it certainly is handy when space is an issue. Take this shot, for example, which I took last night using the 10-22...



    [url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/budrowilson/4542678476/][/url]
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>





    I love this. The angle is wonderful, yes, but the colors are also gorgeous!



  4. #14

    Re: Confusion and Suggestions for Wide Angle



    I would try to recommend the Tokina 11-16 2.8 (for crop body) like the 40D. Its sharp &amp; fast. Great for wide angles in low light. You might want to try the Sigma 10mm 2.8 fisheye.Like the above mentioned, its sharp &amp; great in low light shooting as well. If you like exaggerated distortion, this is your tool. You can "de-fish" it with PTLens.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •